Skip to article

The geography of development

Where the concrete falls heaviest

Where

Illustration for: The geography of development

Summary

Planning applications are not evenly distributed across Malta. San Pawl il-Baħar leads with nearly 12,000 applications, and certain localities have seen dramatic surges in development activity since 2016. Approval rates and sanctioning rates also vary significantly by area.

Key findings

Top localities by total PA applications (all years)

LocalityTotal appsApprovedRefusedApproval rateSanctioning %
San Pawl il-Baħar11,6818,6351,61282.1%22.3%
Birkirkara10,1077,9931,01586.9%19.0%
Mosta9,1677,2371,04385.8%21.0%
Rabat (Malta)7,1825,1201,29478.0%22.9%
Qormi8,2626,3031,06683.6%21.4%
Sliema8,0115,9681,08982.1%17.1%
Naxxar7,5055,72187784.6%22.5%
Mellieħa6,7445,15587184.2%21.8%
Żabbar6,6235,24671286.5%21.3%
Valletta6,2264,76580483.1%14.2%

Notable patterns

  • Rabat (Malta) has the lowest approval rate (78.0%) among the top localities — likely due to ODZ and heritage constraints
  • Valletta has the lowest sanctioning rate (14.2%) — heritage protections may deter build-first-ask-later
  • Fgura stands out with a 24.8% sanctioning rate and 89.7% approval rate — high sanctioning, high approval
  • Attard has the highest sanctioning rate among top localities at 23.3%

Geographic shifts over time (PA applications by era)

LocalityPre-20002000–20052006–20102011–20152016–20202021–2026
San Pawl il-Baħar2,2832,1131,7461,0272,9992,466
Birkirkara2,0381,8061,2987932,1532,037
Mosta1,9431,6881,2547011,9501,725
Naxxar1,2631,1681,0056101,6321,410
Sliema1,2811,4391,1227221,8261,621
Swieqi4715055214361,087839
Qormi1,8061,6121,1256031,8311,725

The 2016 boom

Every locality saw a dramatic surge in applications from 2016 onwards Swieqi saw the most dramatic relative increase: more than doubling from 521 (2006–2010) to 1,087 (2016–2020).

Media sources